Stakeholder Landscape Mapper
Read where they stand. Detect what is not spoken. Decide what to do next.
The problem
Six weeks into a global SAP S/4HANA rollout across 14 countries. Three executive sponsors. Two works councils with legal consultation rights. And two stakeholders who are nodding in steering meetings while quietly working against the program.
This is exactly the kind of high-stakes, time-pressured scenario that Stakeholder Landscape Mapper was built for. Not a generic prompt. A specialist tool with the methodology, the frameworks, and the professional judgment encoded into every output.
What makes this different
Hidden Resistance Detection™
Scans your input data against the Six Resistance Tells: the Disengagement Drop, the Compliance Pivot, the Delegation Shift, the Workaround Sign, the Vague Endorsement, and the Conditional Yes. When two or more fire on the same stakeholder, they're designated with a dashed line on the map. The dashed line shows exactly where silent risk lives.
Signal-to-Map Translation™
Converts direct quotes from interview notes and survey responses into mappable insight plus named, time-bound interventions. Seven translation categories covering historical signals, influencer signals, capacity, conflict, trust, workload, and identity. Every stakeholder gets at least one.
Three Operating Modes
Mode A processes data you already have. Mode B generates the stakeholder survey when you need to send one out. Mode C generates discussion questions for working sessions and 1:1s. One Skill, three workflows that match how change managers actually work.
Confidentiality Architecture
Built-in three-tier output system with explicit distribution warnings. Tier 1 confidential map for CM, sponsor, and key project leads. Tier 2 sanitized summary for steering committees. Tier 3 departmental engagement note for individual leaders.
See it in action
Six weeks into a global SAP S/4HANA rollout across 14 countries. Three executive sponsors. Two works councils with legal consultation rights. And two stakeholders who are nodding in steering meetings while quietly working against the program.
Example prompt
Map the full stakeholder landscape for our SAP S/4HANA rollout. 1,200 employees across 14 countries. Six stakeholder groups: (1) Senior Leadership Team (12 people, 2 suspected covert resistors), (2) Works Councils (2 bodies, Germany + France), (3) Corporate Functions (80 people), (4) Middle Managers (45 people), (5) Operations Staff (400 people), (6) Customer-Facing Teams (300 people). The organization went through redundancies 18 months ago that were handled poorly. Workforce optimization review running concurrently. Audience: me, CHRO, program director. Tier 1 confidential.
Legend
Dashed-Line Designations
SLT (2 of 12 members)
Hidden Resistance Detection fired. Three Tells on the same two members. Designated covert resistors.
Customer-Facing (full group)
Disengagement Drop firing with extreme intensity. 4 weeks of complete silence from 300 people.
What standard Claude produces
Group assessments
Senior Leadership Team, 12 people
Your most urgent problem. Two sponsors performing alignment in meetings while actively undermining the program outside them is a governance failure. The rest of the SLT is watching what happens to them. Name the behavior directly in private conversation, offer a genuine off-ramp, and give it two weeks. If nothing changes, escalate formally; their continued dual role is a program-level risk.
Middle Managers, 45 people.
The most underestimated group. They translate every executive message into what 700+ people actually believe. Many survived the last redundancy round and are now pattern-matching for who's next. Flight risk is real and silent. Brief this group before all-staff, with more candor. Identify 5-7 informal leaders within the cohort and engage them separately.
Operations Staff, 400 people.
Hardest hit by the prior round, longest institutional memory. Expect deep distrust of formal channels and heavy reliance on informal networks. Don't let all-staff communications be their primary channel; they'll discount it. Design listening sessions, not briefings. Acknowledge the prior redundancy handling explicitly before they raise it.
Corporate Functions, 80 people.
Watchful rather than resistant. The risk is passive blockage, slow sign-offs and quiet non-participation framed as capacity constraints. HR is under particular pressure, acting simultaneously as change agents, process owners, and personally affected employees.
Customer-Facing Teams, 300 people.
Internal uncertainty travels directly into customer interactions. If this group disengages, service quality degrades visibly and measurably. Treat silence as withdrawal, not acceptance. Monitor service metrics as your leading indicator of engagement health.
What's running beneath the surface.
The 18-month shadow. This workforce remembers who found out informally, which managers protected their people, and what promises weren't kept. Any communication pattern that echoes those failures will be decoded as confirmation history is repeating. Name the prior handling explicitly, and name what will be different this time.
The works councils. Two councils with legal consultation rights are a governance asset most programs under-use. Engage chairs before any broader communication. If they're onside, they become credibility assets. If they feel bypassed, they have the mandate and mechanism to slow or block.
The informal network. Six weeks in, speculation is already filling the vacuum. Around 8-15 people across your organization shape what others believe, rarely the most senior. Map them, brief them early with more candor than the all-staff message, and they'll carry that credibility into conversations you'll never be in.
Sequencing: non-negotiable.
Works councils → SLT → Middle managers → All staff.
Anyone who learns from an all-staff message before their manager has briefed them has already lost trust in the process. The sequence is the message.
Standard engagement advice. Nothing about which specific SLT members are silently undermining the program, or that the Customer-Facing silence is a Disengagement Drop pattern, not consent.
What Stakeholder Landscape Mapper produces
Hidden Blocker: SLT Covert Resistors (2 of 12 members).
Surface behavior: Suddenly green in steering meetings starting Week 4. Verbal support in every meeting. Both have started sending direct reports to working sessions instead of attending themselves.
Tells firing: Compliance Pivot + Vague Endorsement + Delegation Shift. Three Tells on the same two members. Designated with a dashed line on the map.
Risk vector: They will not block publicly. They will quietly remove resources from the program, slow-walk decisions in their function, and shape the steering narrative away from accountability. Coalition risk with Middle Managers reporting to them.
Hidden Risk: Customer-Facing Teams (300 people, full group).
Surface behavior: Zero questions submitted in the anonymous channel for four consecutive weeks. Zero requested attendance at optional briefings. Silent.
Tells firing: Disengagement Drop, firing with extreme intensity and duration. Override clause applies for single-Tell designation when severity is extreme.
Risk vector: Silence in a high-impact change is not adoption. It is withdrawal. If this group is silent at go-live, service quality degrades visibly and measurably to customers in the first 48 hours. HR is under particular pressure, acting simultaneously as change agents, process owners, and personally affected employees.
Customer-Facing Teams, 300 people.
Internal uncertainty travels directly into customer interactions. If this group disengages, service quality degrades visibly and measurably. Treat silence as withdrawal, not acceptance. Monitor service metrics as your leading indicator of engagement health.
What's running beneath the surface.
The 18-month memory. This workforce remembers who found out informally, which managers protected their people, and what promises weren't kept. Any communication pattern that echoes those failures will be decoded as confirmation history is repeating. Name the prior handling explicitly, and name what will be different this time.
The works councils. Two councils with legal consultation rights are a governance asset most programs under-use. Engage chairs before any broader communication. If they're onside, they become credibility assets. If they feel bypassed, they have the mandate and mechanism to slow or block.
The informal network. Six weeks in, speculation is already filling the vacuum. Around 8-15 people across your organization shape what others believe, rarely the most senior. Map them, brief them early with more candor than the all-staff message, and they'll carry that credibility into conversations you'll never be in.
Sequencing: non-negotiable.
Works councils → SLT → Middle managers → All staff.
Anyone who learns from an all-staff message before their manager has briefed them has already lost trust in the process. The sequence is the message.
Power-Interest grid generated with dashed-line designations on Hidden Blockers. Signal-to-Map Translation surfaces what each stakeholder is protecting, not just that they are resistant. Legal risk flagged before it becomes a go-live injunction. Three-tier Confidentiality Architecture applied. 15-slide deck with named, time-bound interventions.
Notice how Hidden Resistance Detection catches what a standard grid misses: two SLT members are nodding in steering while three Resistance Tells fire on each of them (Compliance Pivot, Vague Endorsement, Delegation Shift). And 300 Customer-Facing employees have asked zero questions in four weeks about a system that changes how they work. Two dashed-line designations. Two completely different patterns of silent risk. Both invisible on the standard grid.
Want to see the full output? Download your free Claude skill →
The difference specialist methodology makes
Same scenario. Same prompt context. Different results.
Getting Started
Install in 60 seconds
No code. No setup. No subscription. Your skill works in every Claude chat, automatically.
Get Stakeholder Landscape Mapper
Individual Skill
$495 USD
one-time
Tax may apply.
Get the SkillBy purchasing, you agree to our License Agreement.
All sales are final. We encourage you to try the free Change Communication Audit before purchasing so you can evaluate the quality firsthand.
How to use your skill
Before you start
Requires a Claude.ai account (Free or Pro). Ensure “Code Execution and File Creation”is toggled ON in Settings → Features. This is required for the skill’s download functionality (PowerPoint and Word outputs).
- 1
After purchase, you’ll receive a download link via email
The file is a .zip. Do not unzip it.
- 2
Log in to claude.ai and go to Settings → Capabilities → Skills
- 3
Click the “Customize” tab, then click “+ Create Skill” and upload the zip file
- 4
Toggle the skill ON in your Skills list
- 5
Check that “Code Execution and File Creation” is enabled under Settings → Features
This is required for downloadable outputs.
- 6
Open a new chat and start using the skill
It auto-activates when you describe your scenario. No need to name the skill explicitly. For best results, use one of the activation phrases listed on this page.
What you'll receive after purchase
Everything you need to deploy this skill inside your own Claude account today. No subscriptions. No platform lock-in. Yours to keep.
One-time purchase
$495 USD
Single-user license. Use in your own Claude account.
Tax may apply.
Get the Skill →By purchasing, you agree to our License Agreement.
- The Skill File (.Zip), optimized for Claude, ready to deploy in minutes
- User Guide with prompt examples for all three operating modes
- Mode B Survey Generator and Mode C Discussion Question Generator built in
- Three-tier Confidentiality Architecture with distribution guidance
- Downloadable .pptx and .docx report generation
- 80+ languages. Zero extra cost.
Who it’s for
Built for practitioners who do the work, not observers who talk about it.
Change manager
Build the confidential stakeholder map. Detect hidden resistance. Translate every interview signal into named, time-bound interventions. Re-run as the change progresses.
Project lead
Use Mode C in working sessions to extract stakeholder intel from your project team. See exactly where stakeholders sit relative to project milestones.
External consultant
Scale your stakeholder methodology across clients. Same rigorous output every engagement. Confidentiality Architecture protects your client positions.
80+ languages.
Zero extra cost.
80+
Languages
100%
Cultural context
$0
Extra cost
This skill works in over 80 languages out of the box. Prompt in English, get output in Japanese. Prompt in Portuguese, get output in Arabic.
Cultural context is maintained, not just word translation. The skill adjusts its frameworks, its tone, and its output for the culture you’re working in, not just the language.
No add-ons. No language packs. It just works.
Related skills
View all skills →Adoption Barrier Predictor
Predict what will block adoption. Fix it before it does.
Stakeholder Pulse Interpreter
Stop guessing what your stakeholders are feeling. Start knowing.
Resistance Playbook
Diagnose. Intervene. Convert.
